السلام عليكم شكرا على مرورك الطيب هذه مدونة تجريبية لتصميم القالب يمكنك زيارتنا على الرابط special1info.blogspot.com https://www.youtube.com/c/HamzaElmrabti

Hands on: iPhone 7 review

TODO alt text

OUR EARLY VERDICT

Apple's gone for a polished, iterative phone and has succeeded in a number of areas - it's a quality handset and not one that many expected given the leaks. However, there aren't a lot of hugely standout features - but all the ones that were there now shine.

FOR

  • Improved screen
  • Water resistant
  • Powerful dual speakers

AGAINST

  • Iterative design
  • No headphone jack
  • Innovative camera on 7 Plus
What's new with the iPhone 7? Either a lot and very little, depending on what matters to you in a phone.
On the one hand, it's now imbued with far superior sonic performance, a much better camera and a more pleasant-to-use screen – and now has no port to plug your headphones into.
On the other hand, barring some slippage of the antenna bands on the rear of the phone, this looks remarkably similar to the iPhone 6 and 6S that preceded it.
So, again, we're in the position of having to work out whether the upgrades to the new iPhone are worth the money, or whether you can save some cash and stick with the iPhone 6S – after all, for a lot of people there's a certain status to owning a new iPhone, and without a radical shape change, the iPhone 7 doesn't offer that upgrade.

iPhone 7 price and release date

The iPhone 7 price is pretty typical, with just three choices once more. These are the 32GB model (thankfully the 16GB option, which was just too small to store today's glut of large apps, is gone), a 128GB option and the top-of-the-range 256GB choice – which is pretty meaty, and unlikely to be filled by even the most ardent media-hoarder.
iPhone 7 review
The 32GB model will cost 32GB $649 (£539, AU$1,079), the 128GB $749 (£619, AU$1,229) and the high-end 256GB $849 (£699, AU$1,379)… but in fairness to Apple, this has matched the price ranges of previous iPhone launches, so the extra memory isn't costing more money, and starts to put the debate over whether Apple should allow for expandable memory to bed, as internal storage is far more stable day to day.
Whichever storage size you go for, the iPhone 7 release date has been predictably set for the week after the announcement, meaning you'll be able to get your hands on one from September 17, with pre-orders starting September 9. If you're thinking of queuing all night, take a blanket, okay? We don't want you catching a cold.

Design

When it comes to the look of the new phone, it might seem like Apple's done very little to change the iPhone 7 design, and that's true to a degree.
iPhone 7 review
The iPhone 7, like the 4, 5 and 6 before it, was supposed to radically change the way the iPhone looks; however, the dimensions and screen size are nearly identical to last year's model, meaning that if you plop a case on this phone you'll struggle to tell the difference between phones from 2014 and 2016.
There are some big changes here, though, and let's start with the biggest one: the loss of the headphone jack.
iPhone 7 review
There are multiple theories as to why Apple has done this, ranging from the conspiracy-based (the company is just doing it to make money from the license fee manufacturers have to pay to create Lightning port headphones) to the helpful (the space taken up by the headphone jack means a thinner phone, and more space for battery).
Apple claimed in its keynote that it had taken "courage" to get rid of the "ancient" port – whether that's good enough remains to be seen.
iPhone 7 review
Either way, it's gone, and that's going to irritate a lot of people who haven't prepared themselves for this moment, watching as Motorola's Moto Z handset performed the same trick earlier in the year and didn't seem to take too much flak as a result.
The good news is that the iPhone 7 will come with a Lightning to 3.5mm headphone jack in the box (ha, jack-in-the-box, just got that one) to help users make the transition – many of us have spent good money on decent headphones and don't want to suddenly have to convert them to Lightning cables, and this will help smooth the process.
There's also a pair of Lightning-powered Earpods, so you'll at least not have to use the connector all the time, especially if you're a fan of basic audio.
The look and feel of the phone is similar to iPhones of the past three years, with the edges nicely rounded and feeling smooth in the hand – there's a good argument here for 'if it ain't broke...', as Apple already had one of the best-looking phones on the market.
The Jet Black model we tried initially was shiny and had an almost plastic feel to it, although the other colors are more matte and traditional.
iPhone 7 review
The movement of the antenna bands on the back is a nice touch though – there's something pleasing about the way the back isn't as broken-up any more, with a solid plate of color looking back at you... you almost wonder why this wasn't done originally when the iPhone 6 emerged, but there are a lot of engineering feats that go on under the surface of smartphones that probably explain that pretty easily.
Talking of colors, it's nice to see the iPhone 7 now coming in Jet Black and just... Black, adding a new shade into the mix – and it's probably the nicest of the lot. Sadly, this means Space Gray is now dead, so you're still slightly limited in your choices
And the other big change: this thing is now water-resistant, with its IP67 rating meaning you can't take it swimming, but you can fall in the pool and take it into the shower... if that's your thing.

New home button

Apple hasn't done away with the home button as some people predicted, but it has done something odd: made the button haptic, so that it vibrates under your finger, rather than clicking all the way in.
It still houses the fingerprint scanner, but this doesn't function in the same way as before.
iPhone 7 review
When you consider how iOS 10 works, with just picking up the phone firing the screen (so you can see your notifications) that makes sense here, but the lack of a tactile click is a tough one to deal with – you'll get used to it, but there's no doubt that it's nicer to feel a comforting press.
It's a hard sensation to get your mind around actually - the idea you have to press harder on this part of the phone without a reason. Yes, the haptic feedback lets you know when you've achieved the right pressure, but it's not the same as a click.
There's also the issue of Siri sometimes firing up when you're pushing too hard - we're sure it'll come with time, but it didn't feel as intuitive as it could have.

Screen

Apple has been behind the curve when it comes to screen resolution for a number of years – and it clearly doesn't care. The near-720p screen feels like a dinosaur in 2016, being seen on phones as far back as the early 2010s – but the sharpness doesn't tell the whole story.
Apple's use of LCD technology, the way the screen is bonded to the glass above, and the overall color reproduction are still excellent, and greatly offset the lack of sharpness – which can be seen in side-by-side comparisons with phones like the Galaxy S7.
iPhone 7 review
It once again shows that Apple isn't thinking about adding virtual reality into the mix for at least another 12 months, as the amount of pixels on the screen right now just can't handle it.
But, as mentioned, the iPhone 7 screen isn't about the resolution, it's about the quality, and bringing in the high color gamut that really is designed to make things pop off the screen.
However, in practice it's hard to say that it really looks that different – the contrast ratios look better, sure, but it's nothing mind-blowing.
iPhone 7 review
It still feels somehow cheap that there's no upgrade to 1080p resolution, or a larger screen than the 4.7 inches we've seen the past few years; Samsung is easily showing the way here with QHD resolution, and it undoubtedly looks better.
There are arguments to be made for increased battery life through having fewer pixels to drive, but Apple should have improved things here, and solved that problem in the same way its peers have. That's not saying 'we want a higher spec for the sake of it' – it would be a real improvement.

Music

When we were guessing what Apple would make the central point of the iPhone 7, music was high on the list – after all, why would you get rid of the headphone jack if you weren't going to offer an improvement in the sonic quality?
The Lightning port can carry a tremendous amount of data across to your headphones, and Apple has boosted the iPhone 7's audio capabilities to match.
iPhone 7 review
Let's start on the outside first though: the new iPhone has dual speakers, rather than the single mono output at the bottom of the phone. These are positioned top and bottom to create decent stereo sound, and the different angles make listening to tunes or watching films a real treat.
When it comes to the internal sound quality, we didn't get long to play with the iPhone 7 and properly assess its audio quality – that's something we're looking forward to doing in our full iPhone 7 review.
However, in terms of the abilities of the iPhone 7, we're expecting some big tweaks inside to improve the quality of the output – and with a bit more research, find out if Apple has added in support for Hi-Res audio files.
That's a big deal, given that the Lightning port can now handle the data transmitted from the better audio quality, and Apple has made a big deal about how this is a great way to get sound out of your phone into your ears. It didn't convince us that it was any better though, beyond freeing up some space for the Taptic engine behind the home button.
iPhone 7 review
Apple has also unveiled another big change: its own proprietary wireless standard. This isn't like the Bluetooth you know, a fact that's illustrated by the new AirPods, which you connect just by placing them by your phone.
They're wireless, but in all other ways they're very similar to the current earpods, apart from their infrared sensors, which can tell when they're in your ears.
iPhone 7 review
It would be a surprise if Apple has decided not to include Hi-Res audio support – while it's beefed up the sound output of the iPhone 7, there's currently no sign of the ability to play back the better-quality files that would really make use of the Lightning port in terms of clear audio quality.

Camera

Apple hasn't really done a huge amount to the camera on the iPhone 7, although there are a few tweaks that will make a difference when compared to the iPhone 6S.
The first of these is cosmetic (for a good reason): the camera bump is now more pronounced than ever, which will irritate those who like to place their phone down on a table without a wobble. (Although let's hope nobody goes as far as grinding off the protrusion to ensure a flush fit this time around).
iPhone 7 review
The snapper on the back of the iPhone 7 is still a 12MP affair, designed to take the best quality pictures without overburdening the phone's engines. That upgrade, along with the larger sensor that's resulted in the camera bump, means you'll get improved low-light pictures, richer snaps in day to day photography and faster shutter speeds too.
The big change here is to the improved color reproduction - it looks OK on the screen when a picture is taken, but it didn't feel startlingly better. Perhaps the monochrome demo area wasn't the best place to try it out, but it seemed that it could be a little brighter.
iPhone 7 review
Live photos are obviously back, needed to make the automatic highlight reels that iOS 10 is offering up look more exciting.
However, unlike the dual-camera setup on the rear of the iPhone 7 Plus, there's not a lot more to talk about here – pictures are a bit better than from last year's iPhone, but without the dual-camera array the iPhone 7 feels a little less exciting than its larger phablet sibling.
iPhone 7 review
The low light picture quality seems improved, but we couldn't test it in the bright environment
The front-facing camera has been boosted to 7MP, with some of the light-enhancing smarts from last year's iPhone 6S rear camera too, to enhance the ability to take selfies.

Battery

Apple has increased the battery life of the iPhone 7 compared to its predecessor, which is the least you'd hope for given that the shape hasn't changed much. However, there was actually a slight battery life drop from the iPhone 6 to 6S (to allow for the 3D Touch screen), so there's no certainty that the new iPhone will extend battery life.
iPhone 7 review
Apple is claiming the iPhone 7 can now last up to two hours longer in 'day to day use' mode than the iPhone 6, and an hour longer than the iPhone 6S, with a lot of these enhancements down to the new A10 Fusion chip, which also allows for low-power efficiency now that it's been boosted to four cores – two for heavy lifting, and two for more menial tasks.

Early verdict

We'll be honest: this is an odd choice from Apple, keeping the same chassis shape as before. Yes, the iPhone 6S was a well-designed phone, and there's no law that says Apple has to reimagine its handsets just for the sake of it.
Apple prefers to let how well its phones actually work day to day sell them, rather than just busting out new specs left, right and center. However, after the recent dip in iPhone sales we expected Apple to come out with something big and new, the great hope for its phone division that re-inspired the buying masses to go for the latest model.
A phone is far more than its cosmetic appearance – and for many, the lack of changes in terms of the way it looks won't matter, as the range of upgrades internally will be enough to satisfy. Its water-resistance is a new feature that will help a lot, and the screen upgrades do improve the quality.
But losing the headphone jack is going to be a tough sell to those not wedded to the iPhone ecosystem, and while Apple has limited the damage by including a converter in the box, it will still give pause to potential buyers.
The iPhone 7 feels iterative AGAIN, which is an odd move at this inflexion point in the company's history. Is this because Apple knows there's not a lot of scope left for innovation in terms of smartphone design? Or is there a big change coming further down the line – could we see the iPhone 8 next year, with all the changes we thought we might see here?
For now, though, the iPhone 7 is exactly what you'd expect from Apple: a glossy, powerful and smooth device with the requisite upgrades in the key areas... whether that's enough, however, is a discussion topic for our full iPhone 7 review.

Asus Transformer 3 Pro


Asus Transformer 3 Pro 2
  • Asus Transformer 3 Pro 2
  • Asus Transformer 3 Pro
  • Asus Transformer 3 Pro 1
  • Asus Transformer 3 Pro 3
  • Asus ROG XG Station 2

SUMMARY


Preview: We test Asus' latest hybrid at Computex
I’ve never seen a Surface Pro competitor look quite so similar to Microsoft's finest. The Asus Transformer 3 Pro takes so many design cues from the Surface Pro 4 that I'd put money on the majority of people mistaking the device for something that has come straight out of Redmond.
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and all that, but is the Transformer 3 Pro actually a worthy competitor? From my initial impressions, I'd say "probably".
The two are near-identical when it comes to technical specifications. First up, the screen: Asus has fitted a 2,860 x 1,920 pixel display to the Transformer 3 Pro, narrowly pipping the 2,736 x 1,824 pixels on the Surface Pro 4. It may not be obvious, but the Asus machine is actually 0.4-inches larger than the Surface Pro 4, with a 12.6in diagonal.
Asus Transformer 3 Pro 3
It looks fantastic, not least because of Asus’ quoted 121% sRGB colour gamut volume. The tablet will get an optional Asus Pen stylus, too, which has 1,024 points of pressure sensitivity – a boon for designers. There wasn’t a stylus on display at the Asus booth, but judging by the pictures of the device, the pen doesn’t appear to benefit from the same magnetic attachment as on the Surface Pro 4.
The Transformer 3 Pro is 8.35mm thick without its keyboard dock and weighs 795g, putting it on a par with Microsoft’s tablet. It will ship with a keyboard dock as standard, however, giving it a one-up on Microsoft. The whole assembly feels very solid; Asus hasn’t cut costs in the build quality department.
In my opinion, it is the keyboard cover that is the strongest suit in this device: it benefits from plenty of travel and a chunky feel, plus the touchpad is smooth and sensitive.
The tablet portion has a kickstand that can tilt the tablet to a near-horizontal position, making it ideal for lap-based working. I didn’t get an opportunity to sit down with it on my lap, though, so it will be interesting to see how stable it is in the real world.
Asus Transformer 3 Pro 1
Performance will come from a dual-core Intel Core i5-6200U or i7-6500U processor, depending on specification. Performance was smooth and responsive during my hands-on, and given the track record of these processors, I’ve no reason to think this will differ with regards to the final product. Supporting the processor will be up to 16GB of RAM and PCI Express-based SSDs with capacities of up to 1TB.
Also included in the Transformer 3 Pro is a full set of ports here. There’s full-size USB 3.0, a USB 3.1-C/Thunderbolt 3.0 combination port, a microSD card reader and a full-size HDMI port, too.
The Thunderbolt port can be used to connect to the external Asus ROG XG Station 2 graphics dock, which lets you hook up to a full-sized desktop graphics card for PC gaming on your tiny tablet. When demonstrated, it looked fairly flaky and buggy, but I’ll put this down to pre-production niggles.
Asus ROG XG Station 2
The ROG gaming dock with a STRIX GTX 1080 onboard
Battery life could be one point of contention: on the device I tried, 56% of the battery remained with an estimated rundown time of 2hrs 5mins. However, note that the device was running at maximum brightness. Nevertheless, the numbers suggest you'll have to do some serious conservation for the Transformer 3 Pro to make it through a day’s work.

ASUS TRANSFORMER 3 PRO – PRICE AND RELEASE DATE

Price for the Transformer 3 Pro will start at £900 for an i5 model with 4GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, and go up to £1,400 for an i7 with 8GB of RAM and 512GB storage. This undercuts the Surface Pro 4 by around £70 for a bottom-spec model.
The Transformer Pro 3 will be available in the UK in August. I look forward to pitting it head-to-head with the Surface Pro 4.

Acer Switch Alpha 12 review

OF 7


Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12
  • Acer Switch Alpha 12

SUMMARY



  • 12-inch 2,160 x 1,440 IPS touchscreen
  • Intel Core i3, i5 or i7 U-suffix processors
  • Keyboard included
  • Total weight: 1.25kg
  • Fanless, liquid-cooled
  • Manufacturer: Acer
  • Review Price: £600.00

WHAT IS THE ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12?

The Switch Alpha 12 is Acer’s attempt to create a Microsoft Surface rival. It aims to offer the same tablet-first convertible experience, but at a significantly more competitive £600 starting price. That makes it over £100 cheaper than similarly specified convertibles, such as the Galaxy TabPro S and Surface Pro 4.
The Switch Alpha 12 generally delivers solid performance and will meet most Windows fans' tablet and laptop needs. However, issues with its touchpad, battery and a minor bloatware infestation make it hard to wholeheartedly recommend over moderately pricier competitors.

ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – DESIGN AND BUILD

2016 has seen an influx of Surface Pro rivals. The majority of them are cut-down copies of Microsoft’s convertible and their only real selling point is a moderately reduced price tag. At first glance the Switch Alpha does little to change this trend.
The boxy all-metal tablet section’s silver-grey finish hardly exudes the same class you'd get from a Surface Pro. The attachable keyboard is also almost identical to a Surface Type Cover, which is a good thing.

This all may make the Switch Alpha 12 sound a little dull, but up close I noticed a few design changes that fix some of the Surface’s niggling flaws.
For starters the keyboard cover has a loop for the Switch Alpha 12’s optional stylus to fit into. This sounds small, but considering the hefty £40-plus that most active styluses cost, the loop’s presence is a serious bonus that makes it harder to misplace the pen.
The addition of a USB 3.1 port that can be used to power devices, transfer files or attach the device to an external monitor is another nice bonus. The accompanying full-sized USB 3.0 port makes the Switch Alpha 12 significantly better connected than many competing convertibles, which only have single USB-C ports, like the Huawei Matebook and Samsung Galaxy TabPro S.
Acer Switch Alpha 12
I’m also a fan of the Acer’s take on the Surface’s kickstand. The stand disconnects from the back and can be used to sit the device at a variety of angles. Many rivals only allow for two or three sitting angles, so this is a great ddition. It also has a grippy rubber bottom, which helps stop it sliding or moving when you’re using the Switch Alpha 12 on your lap.
Build quality is solid. After a week and a half lugging the Switch Alpha 12 in my satchel around London, the device remained scratch- and chip-free.
The Acer Switch Alpha 12’s configuration options are also generally in line with the Surface’s, outside of the use of an Intel Core i3, rather than a Core M CPU in its cheapest specification. Buyers can choose to load the device with a sixth-gen Intel Core i3, i5 or i7 U-series CPU and 4-8GB of DDR3 memory.
The lack of a 1TB storage option is a bigger issue for me. Acer’s only offering the Switch Alpha 12 with 128-512GB of SSD storage. This won’t be a problem for most people, but it will be an problem for people with large media libraries, or designers looking for a mobile touch-up station. I reviewed the basic Core i3 version with 128GB of storage and 4GB of RAM.
Acer Switch Alpha 12

ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – KEYBOARD AND TOUCHPAD

My only qualms with the Switch Alpha 12’s design stem from its slightly lacklustre keyboard dock.
First, the good: the backlit keyboard section is better than average. The keys aren’t as tactile nor as pleasant to type on as a proper laptop’s keyboard, but they’re miles better than the MateBook and Galaxy TabPro S’s attachable covers. Keys feel reactive and have reasonable travel, too. They’re also nicely spaced out, which makes it easier to comfortably type without making constant mistakes.
I’m less enamoured of the touchpad. The pad’s palm detection works well and it has a nice smooth finish. But the device features a horrid all-in-one design where the discrete right- and left-click buttons integrate into the main pad. This makes it all too easy to have the pointer go flying off your intended target when you try to click and drag.
Sensitivity for basic tasks is fine and the pad feels reactive, but its multi-touch abilities aren’t up to scratch. The touchpad struggles to recognise basic tasks like scrolling up and down using two fingers. All too often the pad wouldn’t recognise my commands, and would then inexplicably jump into action and enact every instruction I’d given it. The problem was intermittent but fairly annoying and would regularly cause chaos on spreadsheets or text files I was editing.
Acer Switch Alpha 12

ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – SCREEN

The Acer Switch Alpha 12’s 12-inch screen features some impressive specifications, on paper at least. The 2,160 x 1,440 resolution easily matches its key rivals, including the Surface Pro 4, and ensures text and icons are uniformly sharp.
To the naked eye colours are also solid and, thanks to the use of IPS screen tech, whites are nice and clean. I didn’t notice severe backlight bleed either. If all you want to do is watch Netflx, browse the web or doodle a few quick notes in OneNote, the screen is more than up to scratch.
However, more in-depth testing with a colorimeter revealed a few issues with the display that will put off some buyers. The 456.7nits max brightness is very bright, but the 0.56 black level gives it a distinctly average 795:1 contrast ratio. The 8,712k colour temperature is also well above the 6,500k ideal.
The screen’s 81.3% coverage of the sRGB colour gamut is OK for regular use, but its 57.8% coverage of the Adobe RGB is disappointing.
For regular folks who just want a tablet to watch Netflix, or a laptop to web browse, these figures won’t be a problem. The Adobe RGB coverage will, however, be a serious negative for professional artists and designers looking to take advantage of the Aspire’s stylus.
The inaccurate colours make the tablet a poor choice for editing photos or digital painting. A few years ago this would've been fine, but since the arrival of stellar tablets like the Galaxy TabPro S, there are better convertibles available for artists.

ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – AUDIO AND CAMERA

Hybrid devices generally offer pretty poor audio quality. The thin dimensions and focus on portability mean they always come loaded with tiny, generally underpowered speakers. This remains true on the Switch Alpha 12. The tablet section’s speakers are good enough for Netflix watching in bed, but it's underpowered for pretty much everything else.
Maximum volume levels aren’t as high as the Surface Pro 4’s and rapidly become tinny when you try to play music on them. Being fair to Acer, though, they’re no worse than on most other Windows tablets and this is an issue I’ve encountered on close to all of the hybrids I’ve tested.
The front microphone is similarly weak, which is a shame as the front camera can shoot at 1080p. During video chats the person on the other end of the line struggled to hear me with even moderate background noise. The camera also didn’t perform as well as I expected. Even though it can shoot at 1080p, it struggles in even moderately dim lighting conditions. Recording on an overcast London morning the camera made me look like a member of the Walking Dead.

ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – PERFORMANCE

I reviewed the cheapest Intel Core i3 configuration of the Switch Alpha 12 with 4GB of RAM. This makes direct comparisons with other convertibles I’ve tested slightly tricky, as the Surface Pro 4 I reviewed had a Core i5 configuration and the Huawei Matebook and Galaxy TabPro S units we've tested ran using lower-power M chips.
The i3 model performed moderately better than the ultra-low-power Intel Core M devices during my synthetic benchmark tests.
On the generalist Geekbench 3 benchmark, which gives a rough gauge of a device’s overall performance, the Switch Alpha 12 ran in with 2,662 single-core and 5,449 multi-core scores, which put it above competing Core M-powered devices. The MateBook ran in with 2,250 single-core and 4,254 multi-core scores on the same test.
The Switch Alpha 12’s lead continued on the PCMark Home test, where it scored 2,369, offering a slight performance boost on the Matebook, which scored 2,074.
Acer Switch Alpha 12
Intel HD graphics aren’t suitable for even moderately demanding gaming, but the Switch Alpha 12 managed to run Minecraft at a playable framerate during my tests.
The Switch Alpha 12 also performed admirably during my digital painting sessions. Despite the screen’s poor colour gamut coverage, the stylus is pretty good. The palm-detection tech isn’t the best around, but it’s good enough for basic sketching and I didn’t notice any latency when drawing onto the screen. The machine began to chug when I started trying to 3D model on the tablet section, but this was for a big project.
The CPU's liquid-cooling system also ensured the device ran silently, through the back did noticeably heat up with prolonged use. Still, having no fan noise is a big boon.
My only serious performance issue with the Alpha 12 is its bloatware infestation. Acer’s loaded the Switch Alpha 12 with more unneeded and unwanted applications than you can shake a stick at. The moment you power up the device you’re bombarded with requests from numerous products. Lowlights include Acer Documents, Care Centre, abFiles, abPhoto and McAfee security. The one piece of welcome software, HoverAccess for the stylus, doesn't work properly.
Most of these offer superfluous clone services to those already included on Windows 10 and are nothing but an annoyance. Some will welcome the inclusion of McAfee, but I prefer to pick my security service provider and not have one pushed upon me, especially when the package is very aggressive and eats up memory and battery life.
ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12 – BATTERY LIFE
Battery life is one key area where the Switch Alpha 12 fails to deliver. Even after I’d turned off McAfee and switched off all unnecessary processes, the device didn’t perform well during our Powermark battery burn. This involves synthetically looping 10 minutes of web browsing and 5 minutes of video playback with the screen brightness set to 150nits.
With all the superfluous processes turned off, the device generally lasted 5-6 hours before dying. The score isn’t terrible, but that puts it well behind competing M-powered hybrids such as the Galaxy TabPro S, which usually last at least 7 hours.
Running McAfee and other background apps the Switch Alpha 12’s battery dropped dramatically and it only lasted 4 hours running the Powermark test.
Real-world use reflected the below-average battery performance. Streaming video on Netflix with brightness at 75% the device discharged 15-18% of its charge per hour. Using it as my primary work machine the Aspire Switch 12 needed to be reconnected to the mains at around 3.30pm, having been first switched on at 9.30am.Acer Switch Alpha 12

SHOULD I BUY THE ACER SWITCH ALPHA 12?

If you’re after a Surface Pro 4, but don’t have quite enough cash, then the Acer Switch Alpha 12 is a solid choice. The basic Intel Core i3 model I reviewed offers fantastic value for money. For a modest £600 Acer’s offering the main tablet section plus an attachable keyboard and active stylus – two add-ons for which most companies charge as much as £150 extra.
If you’re determined to get a Windows convertible, the Acer Switch Alpha 12 is one of the best semi-affordable options available. Its overall appeal is let down by two crucial points, however: its poorly calibrated screen and below-average battery life.
The screen is more than sharp enough for regular use, but its poor colour gamut coverage makes it ill-suited to even basic design, painting or photo editing. The use of an i3 processor rather than the more power-efficient M chip, and the addition of power-hungry bloatware, also mean it won’t last a full working day off one charge.
The Surface Pro 4 remains a better choice for buyers who can afford it. Those on a shoestring budget who need a device now would also be better off checking out Microsoft’s older Surface 3, which can be picked up for as little as £400, but doesn’t come bundled with a Type Cover and you'll have to make do with an anaemic Intel Atom processor.
There are also a number of great-looking convertibles set to arrive in the near future, such as the Asus Transformer Pro 3. So buyers who aren’t in a rush may also be better off waiting and seeing how these compare before handing over their hard-earned cash.
VERDICT
A great-value convertible, slightly let down by poor battery life and a badly calibrated screen.

OVERALL SCORE

SCORES IN DETAIL

  • Battery Life6
  • Design7
  • Heat & Noise8
  • Performance7
  • Screen Quality6
  • Touchpad6
  • Value8

LATEST DEALS FROMEBAY


All rights reserved to specialized computing Usage agreement |Privacy-Policy

Design:Hamza Elmrabti